Discovering appropriate friends for monetary evaluation is a vexing process that requires cautious consideration of corporations’ underlying economics, accounting decisions, and monetary assertion presentation. However with out comparable monetary assertion data, peer benchmarking could yield much less significant and even deceptive insights that negatively affect earnings forecasts.
In a latest research printed in The Accounting Evaluate, we developed a strategy to establish comparable corporations for benchmarking and analyzed its implications for analyst outcomes and valuation with multiples. On this put up, we are going to spotlight the salient particulars, a few of which can shock you.
There are alternative ways to outline peer corporations, resembling {industry} membership, inventory index membership, closeness in market capitalization, and similarity in worth drivers (e.g., P/E ratio, return-on-invested capital, and progress).
As an alternative choice to conventional classifications, researchers have examined new methods to establish peer corporations, resembling traders’ co-search, depth of corporations’ filings with the SEC’s EDGAR, and inventory data on Yahoo! Finance.
These broadly utilized strategies fail to instantly handle a vital side of agency benchmarking: the provision of key monetary assertion data for peer corporations. When a number of monetary assertion line objects are lacking for a peer agency, analysts wrestle to derive significant inferences from the comparative to the focal agency’s monetary statements.
Our monetary assertion benchmarking (FSB) measure goals to fill this hole. The information and code are freely accessible on our web site.
Capturing the Diploma of Overlap Between Monetary Assertion Objects
Constructed on the Jaccard similarity coefficient, pairwise FSB captures the diploma of overlap in monetary assertion objects reported by two corporations, with scores starting from 0 (no overlap) to 1 (full overlap). The upper the FSB rating, the larger the benchmarking data accessible to exterior customers.
As an illustration, if the focal agency has reported 270 objects, 200 of which overlap with 220 objects reported by the peer agency, the FSB rating is 0.69 (200 / (270 + 220 – 200). To place this into context, the typical rating for analyst-chosen friends in our pattern is 0.68.
Assuming that FSB is a useful metric in capturing the similarity of two corporations’ underlying economics and accounting decisions, we anticipate it to be positively correlated with analysts’ decisions of peer corporations.
Our pattern of analyst-chosen friends comes from a Evaluate of Accounting Research article, “Analysts’ selection of peer firms.” By manually screening greater than 2,500 sell-side fairness analysts’ reviews, the authors extracted knowledge on comparable peer corporations chosen for the focal agency in every report.
In our research, for every analyst-chosen peer agency, we chosen an identical agency in the identical {industry} that was not chosen however which had an analogous dimension and valuation a number of. The outcomes present that analysts have a tendency to decide on peer corporations which can be extra akin to a focal agency from a monetary assertion benchmarking perspective.
When FSB is greater by one-standard-deviation, the probability of being chosen as a peer agency by an analyst will increase by 13%.
Increased FSBs Improve Accuracy of Earnings Forecasts
Does selecting friends with greater FSBs have optimistic implications for analyst efficiency? We discover that when the typical FSB of the set of analyst-chosen peer corporations is one-standard-deviation greater, the accuracy of analysts’ earnings forecasts will increase by about 23%.
When choosing peer corporations, search for corporations which have extra related monetary statements to the focal agency, even when meaning looking exterior the focal agency’s important {industry}. In actual fact, solely 40% of the analyst-chosen peer corporations function in the identical product market because the focal agency.
Which firms do you suppose could be good peer corporations to decide on when analyzing Colgate-Palmolive? Morningstar lists Procter & Gamble and Unilever as high friends for the corporate. Regardless of being listed on a US inventory alternate, Unilever has a modest 0.69 FSB rating with Colgate-Palmolive.
That is probably as a result of the corporate makes use of Worldwide Monetary Reporting Requirements to organize its monetary statements. Utilizing totally different accounting requirements reduces comparability on account of variations within the recognition and presentation guidelines. In distinction, P&G and Colgate-Palmolive have a better FSB rating of 0.77, suggesting a larger comparability than Unilever and Colgate-Palmolive.
In distinction to Morningstar’s method, Google Finance creates an inventory of peer corporations based mostly on traders’ co-search exercise. Notably, among the many peer corporations Google Finance lists for Colgate-Palmolive is Coca-Cola. Though this statement could appear unintuitive at first blush, our methodology means that, from a monetary assertion benchmarking perspective, Coca-Cola could be a superb match on this case as a result of its FSB rating with Colgate-Palmolive is effectively above the typical at 0.82. This will likely clarify why traders extensively co-search the monetary data of the 2 firms.
Validation and Testing
After validating and testing the pairwise FSB metric, we aggregated knowledge throughout all {industry} friends of the focal agency to grasp how straightforward it’s to benchmark a agency’s monetary statements general. This course of yielded a big panel of firm-level FSB knowledge. Additionally, to counterpoint our methodology, we decomposed FSB on the monetary assertion degree, producing separate FSB scores for the earnings assertion, steadiness sheet, and assertion of money flows.
![Financial Analysts Journal Current Issue Tile](https://i0.wp.com/blogs.cfainstitute.org/investor/files/2021/02/New-FAJ-Tile.jpg?resize=640%2C233&ssl=1)
Whereas analysts’ consensus earnings and internet debt forecasts are extra correct when firm-level FSB is excessive (i.e., it’s straightforward to benchmark and perceive a agency’s monetary statements), earnings assertion and steadiness sheet benchmarking play totally different roles in these outcomes.
We discover that the Revenue assertion FSB rating predicts the accuracy of earnings forecasts however not internet debt forecasts. In distinction, steadiness sheet FSB rating predicts the accuracy of internet debt forecasts, however not earnings forecasts. In financial phrases, a one-standard-deviation enhance in earnings assertion (steadiness sheet) FSB is related to a 17.3% (12.1%) extra correct consensus earnings (internet debt) forecasts. These findings spotlight that benchmarking advantages rely on the context of the evaluation.
For the Investor: Business, Business-Measurement, or FSB Friends
Past optimistic analyst outcomes, a key query for traders is whether or not selecting peer corporations based mostly on FSB improves valuation with comparables. To this finish, we in contrast the predictive means of the valuation multiples fashioned utilizing FSB-based friends to these of the fashions using conventional strategies for peer agency choice, resembling industry- and size-based friends. Particularly, we regressed the long run enterprise value-to-sales ratio (EVS) of the focal agency on the typical EVS calculated for 3 units of friends: (1) {industry} friends, (2) industry-size friends, and (3) FSB friends.
When predicting one-year, two-year, and three-year-ahead EVS, the fashions utilizing the typical valuation a number of of FSB-based friends persistently outperform these using solely industry- and industry-size friends. As an illustration, the R-squared of the mannequin predicting one-year-ahead EVS will increase from 24.8% to 31.8% when the typical EVS of the 4 highest FSB friends is included within the mannequin.
In conclusion, we notice that FSB is an easy, simple measure summarizing the overlap in peer corporations’ underlying economics and accounting decisions, that are the important thing components that form monetary statements. FSB is out there on the pairwise and agency ranges, permitting exterior customers to search out appropriate peer corporations for varied functions, together with relative efficiency, compensation, and valuation benchmarking.