Market
Historical past of product value obtainable as a graph on the backside of the overview or accessible by a “Present Value Historical past” button beneath the purchase selections . Each value change by the seller creates a brand new information level on the graph with a date and a value.
It is going to assist distributors who make the most of fomo ways to reinforce gross sales. If additionally it is obtainable within the stats facet by facet with gross sales it is going to assist distributors gauge what their finest value is.
One thing like this however the x axis will get an entry with each value change .
So the dates aren’t periodic
Every overview has the worth the consumer purchased the product for subsequent to it . Nevertheless as this transfer could also be useful for a lot of customers searching merchandise ,chances are you’ll object that it raises privateness considerations.Which means if somebody sees your actual title and subsequent to it “purchased for $10000” you could be uncomfortable and hesitant to overview a product .Effectively , what if somebody sees your actual title within the opinions of a product that prices $10000 ? What modifications ? Roughly the identical impact.
Weigh opinions by price of buy and present opinions given whereas the product was free usually when you do the above change.Let those that want to abuse the system by having accounts overview their product whereas free assume it really works , let the customers searching for merchandise seethat this vendor had 30 opinions who purchased at 0$ .Which means whereas the product is free the opinions are weighed equally and when it turns into paid then they’re outweighed by different opinions.
Add to the rating system a rating that’s calculated by the overview stars and the worth the reviewer purchased at, and add a brand new tab for it subsequent to the favored tab.As an illustration :
review_score=(review_stars-2.5)*purchase_price (NOT itemizing value!)
Then when a purchaser clicks this tab the merchandise are sorted based mostly on their gathered rating above.Why does that show you how to ? Costly + good merchandise float to the highest of this tab.
The objection to the most recent assertion is “The costly and coercive for opinions will float to the highest really” . Sure that’s true so :
If a consumer can show he was incentivized / bribed / coerced / promised in change for a overview by a vendor then he will get a refund (minus the mql5 fee)
If the seller now not has the funds within the account , or an quantity for that , then he get’s a detrimental steadiness which is paid to that consumer till the quantity of the acquisition value (NOT the itemizing value!) is repaid (minus the fee). For those who can not try this logistically or legally exterior of the 7day holding interval , improve the interval to 14days and if the seller has no funds he’s banned from the market.
Alerts
Take a look at this picture :
The sign supplier has floating trades
Registers the account as a sign
Proceeds to shut the trades and pumps the sign stats
It is usually doable there are nonetheless trades open from earlier than the registration that are slowly “dripped” (closed) to faux the sign is rising.
so :
Don’t measure efficiency earlier than registration of the sign
Don’t measure efficiency based mostly on trades opened prior the registration of the sign
Show huge yellow vertical bars round deposits/withdrawals of a sign within the graph with a warning signal. I nonetheless do not perceive why some suppliers do the “deposit/withdraw on the similar day” however i am certain there is a doable exploit in there.
photograph by Pavel Danilyuk
Add your individual concepts within the feedback if you’d like